Yes, this is a picture of crack cocaine, brought to you by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.
28 grams of crack cocaine can earn you a $28,000 per year prison sentence. A growing consensus of policy makers and activists hope to see that changed.
U.S. President Richard Nixon is credited as the first person to declare a “war on drugs”, stating in a 1971 press conference that the abuse of drugs was “public enemy number one”. Unfortunately, America’s War on Drugs has proven to be much like Vietnam, the other war of Nixon’s presidency: long, destructive, only moderately successful, and often suffering from an unclear sense of purpose. The following year, 1972, Nixon became embroiled in the Watergate scandal, thus insuring that he – not drugs – would become public enemy number one.
Today, America’s prisons are overflowing with those convicted of drug-related offenses. While some are hardened criminals at the center of massive drug rings, others are serving a mandatory sentence of five years for being found in possession of just 28 grams (about one ounce) of crack cocaine. Outside the U.S., Americans’ drug habits fuel violence in Mexico and around the world that is claiming thousands of lives. While it may not be clear what “winning” the War on Drugs would look like, it is obvious that we are far from that point. Continue reading
Photo by Wikipedia user Trounce
Today, we turn our attention to that rarest of species, the female Bible major at an evangelical or otherwise conservative Christian university. While male Bible majors have always been plentiful, very few females are ever spotted in the wild. This is why most Bible majors have to be put through a captive breeding program, a.k.a. seminary.
You may be thinking that the reason we have such a lack of females in Bible departments is that they simply lack interest or initiative, and there is some truth to that. However, they also face certain predators, namely cultural expectations and the fact that few of them would ever have a chance to actually teach scripture in their preferred evangelical church. While more opportunities for females to teach are opening up, there is still a lack of plentiful resources to nourish a thriving population. Continue reading
Republican presidential candidates during one of many debates that were
part of the 2012 campaign.
Flickr photo credit: AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall, Pool
Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus made news this past week when he threatened to prevent NBC and CNN from hosting any Republican presidential primary debates in 2016 if they refuse to cancel planned Hillary Clinton-themed projects. As he said on the MSNBC program Morning Joe, “I cannot have companies that are in the business of making what I consider to be promotional movies about the life of Hillary Clinton . . . depose the candidates for president on the Republican side of the aisle” Take that, mainstream media!
I’m not going to attempt to suggest that the people at NBC and CNN aren’t dying for Hillary to run in 2016. I mean, just imagine a primary race in which Joe Biden is the presumptive frontrunner: it might provide plenty of fodder for comedians, but it wouldn’t do much to capture the public’s imagination. The Clintons, on the other hand, have true star power. Even the producers at Fox News must be secretly hoping for her to run so that they can reap the benefits of an anti-Hillary campaign. Continue reading
First page of the first edition of William Shakespeare’s play “Richard III”
England’s King Richard III has been experiencing a bit of renaissance lately after his remains were discovered underneath a carpark (a.k.a. parking lot) in Leicester, UK last year. Of particular interest has been the debate over whether or not Shakespeare’s portrayal of the late king in his famous play Richard III is historically accurate. Scholars had suspected for some time that the villainous, deformed version of Richard that appears in the Bard’s script could have been a clever form of Tudor-era propaganda – the Tudors being the English royal dynasty that unseated Richard III and would have been keen to emphasize his illegitimacy as king.
The discovery of Richard III’s skeleton has now proved that at least two details in Shakespeare’s play were incorrect: the king did not have a withered hand, and while he did suffer from scoliosis (side-to-side curvature of the spine), descriptions of a hideous hunchback were exaggerated. As for the many crimes that Shakespeare alleges – murdering his two nephews and a brother while manipulating his way to the throne – the Richard III Society offers a spirited defense for him.
In addition, a mock trial at Indiana University’s law school in 1996, presided over by former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court William Rehnquist and other legal experts, found Richard III not guilty of murdering the two princes. Taking all of this into consideration, and remembering that the play was written more than a century after Richard’s death, it seems quite likely that at least part of Shakespeare’s tale was invention. Continue reading
White House photo by Pete Souza
When writing about tensions between the U.S. and Russia, it’s all too tempting to choose a headline that brings to mind the Cold War. I could have gone for, “New cold front hits U.S.-Russian relations”, “U.S.-Russia relationship enters deep freeze”, or “The Cold War is over, but it still feels frosty!” Yet, in doing so, I think I would not have demonstrated personal creativity so much as a dependence on overused journalistic metaphors. Instead, I’m going to go the smart Alec route and tell you to come up with your own headline.
All kidding aside, relations between the U.S. and Russia do appear to be on the downswing, although they may not have reached an all-time nadir. (Please note my impressive use of the word “nadir”, which is a much better testament to my creativity than a corny headline.) President Obama just canceled a planned bilateral summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, and he has decided not to meet with his Russian counterpart on the sidelines of the upcoming G20 gathering in St. Petersburg. Continue reading
Photo uploaded to Wikipedia by Prioryman, attributed to “Steve”
History has seen its share of monumental rocks. There was the stone that killed Goliath, the Hope Diamond, the star of films such as Fast and Furious 6, and the renaming of Simon as “Peter”, a.k.a. the rock on which Christ’s church would be built. But only one rock is currently causing a diplomatic crisis….Well, actually the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem could be a second, but just forget about that for now. The rock of which I speak is the Rock of Gibraltar.
Ah, Gibraltar: It only has 2.6 square miles of real estate (that picture above is of the whole thing, plus part of Spain), but a very strategically located 2.6 square miles. The small peninsula sticks out into the narrow channel connecting the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea, making it a perfect location for anyone engaged in either international trade or international warfare. If it didn’t already exist, the guys who made those palm islands in Dubai would have been forced to create it. Continue reading
I’m going to do something today that might shock even myself. I’m going to defend the ignorance of my fellow Americans in several areas. In general, I’m opposed to ignorance. In fact, I will have to overlook several perfectly valid counterpoints in order to play this role of devil’s advocate. What you are about to witness is something which may not happen again, but for the sake of argument, it is happening right now.
It is all too easy to point out the deficiencies in the average American’s knowledge about our world, and if it’s easy for me, it’s even easier for foreigners. Most Americans are more likely to know about the exploits of Kim Kardashian than Angela Merkel (the Chancellor of Germany and current champion on Forbes’s “100 Most Powerful Women” list). But as I’m about to show, there are perfectly understandable reasons for this state of affairs beyond simple stupidity. Continue reading
Photo by Wikipedia user MamaGeek
From the title of this post, you may be inclined to think that it is going to be a serious discussion about business in America, but in fact it’s mostly a rant about my latest travel experience. Nevertheless, I think you will find that my “on the ground” observations are at least as indicative of the progress of this merger between two “budget airlines” as anything you will find on the pages of the Wall Street Journal. So strap in and secure your tray tables in the upright and locked position – it’s going to be a bumpy ride. (I have no idea what that last sentence was about, but it sounds pretty awesome.)
About half of the flights I take are from my current home base Washington, D.C. to my original home base in western Michigan. It used to be that Delta had a nice direct flight from Reagan National Airport – located about a 10 minute drive from my apartment – to Grand Rapids, Michigan. I’d leave about 7:30 pm and get in around 9:00 pm. It was low stress and even slightly affordable. Ah, those were the good old days. Continue reading
With the House Republicans having voted dozens of times to repeal Obamacare (a.k.a. The Affordable Care Act), only to have each of those proposals die upon arrival in the Senate, Republicans such as Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas), Sen. Marco Rubio (Florida), and Sen. Mike Lee (Utah) are making a new push to simply defund the program, thus killing it in every sense that matters.
There is some reason to believe that Republicans might have more luck with this approach, since they are clearly more successful at preventing something from passing than ensuring that it gets passed. However, one Republican isn’t so sure that this strategy can achieve the desired result. Continue reading
Photo by Wikipedia user Edgar Jiménez
With a single question, the newly minted Pope set off a worldwide media reaction – and raised some important questions about the state of the papacy in the 21st century.
I don’t claim to know everything there is to know about the papacy. Smarter people than I have devoted their lives to the subject and still been left with profound mysteries. However, there is one thing of which I am fairly certain: popes do not give impromptu, unrestricted press conferences aboard the papal plane. (Fun fact: the plane, hereafter to be known as Pontiff One, does not run on destructive fossil fuels, but is instead carried invisibly by angels.)
Yet, that is exactly what Pope Francis did earlier this week during his trip back from a successful outing to Brazil, going where the Queen of England still fears – or at least refuses – to tread: in front of a group of reporters. Fortunately for the assembled media, the Q & A session proved to be newsworthy for more than one reason. When one of them asked the Holy Father a question about the supposed “gay lobby” in the Vatican that has so fascinated the Italian press, Francis gave a surprisingly nuanced answer. Continue reading